Spammers Hijack Top Florist Google Local Listings

| | Comments (5) | TrackBacks (0)

What started out as a report of weirdness in some Google Local florist listings has turned into a story of how a group of spammers could hijack the local identities of some of the largest, most respected florists in the US – including Lehrer’s and Veldkamp’s of Denver, Podesta Baldocchi and Church Street Flowers of San Francisco, Starbright Floral Design of New York City, Phoenix Flower Shops and numerous other major city floral operations.

On Friday morning an alert San Diego FlowerChat member noticed that two of the Google Local Ten Pack listings for his city had abruptly changed.  Instead of displaying the names and details of the real shops, Che Bella and Rosita’s Flower Shop, the listings sported ‘Convenient Flowers’ and ‘Amazing Flowers’ and the links pointed to URLs which then redirected (via affiliate links) to national floral affiliate reseller companies.

 

San-Diego-flowers.jpg

The hijacks were reported in Google’s Maps Group Spam Report thread.

Mike Blumenthal, of Understanding Google Maps and Yahoo Local Search spotted the posts and then gave me a ‘heads up’ on how the spammers did it:

1) They could only change unclaimed listings and did so via the ‘Edit’ links.

2) Some time in late August, under a variety of different user identities, the affiliate(s) began changing the names, addresses, phone numbers and URLs - and in some cases, adding user reviews which included the “new” business names. (The timeline and changes can be viewed on each listing via Google Maps by clicking on the company name, selecting ‘Edit’ in the pop-up balloon, and then clicking ‘View History’.)

The positions at or near the top of local search as well as the now stolen user reviews were preserved – but all of the traffic was directed to the affiliate links.  Florists weren’t alerted by phone because most of the listed numbers had been changed.

The florists with whom I spoke did not realize their listings had been hijacked until the information had populated into Universal Search and was seen on the main Google search page.

One shop owner who tried to reclaim her listing was unable to get anywhere because she couldn’t validate by phone nor receive a postcard - since both the phone number and address had been changed.

The good news is that in some cases, by simply re-editing a listing and reverting the details back to the original information, the correct store details can be restored. (Although it will take time for the data to re-populate to the Ten Pack.)

But that hasn’t worked for everyone.  Michael of Church Street Flowers was able to restore his domain name, but is still stuck with a bad phone number and the affiliate’s phony business name. He started the process of claiming his listing Friday afternoon so there may be a lock on the data at the moment.  Four ‘users reviews’ for the phony florist were also added to his page, and that may complicate the name change as well.

 

Church-Street-Listing.jpg
 

My advice to anyone who got hijacked is to change back the data in the exact reverse order in which it was first changed. If it was modified over 3 or 4 steps, try doing the same in reverse. Once corrected, claim the listing immediately.

For more information about claiming local search listings read the Florist SEO Blog.  Do it now or you business could be the next victim. 

Since all these changes were made by hand, and not some bulk upload, finding and reverting them will be a tedious challenge. I’m hoping the Maps team will take a look at the user IDs and activity and give these florists any help they can.

Needless to say, Google’s method of allowing users to change legitimate company data is seriously flawed, but I ultimately hold the floral companies who offer incentives for this behavior - the resellers and the floral wire services – responsible. Their lack of enforcing their own Terms of Service makes all legitimate local florists prey, not partners.

Oddly enough, it was an affiliate of a 1-800-Flowers affiliate reseller that hijacked one of 1-800-Flowers' top franchisees, Veldkamp’s. Maybe this latest episode in deceptive wire service affiliates will finally be a wake-up call.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Spammers Hijack Top Florist Google Local Listings.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.flowerchat.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/434

5 Comments

Hi Catherine,

We appreciate the attention you've brought to this particular case of spam and are actively working on removing it from Google Maps. I'm happy to see that you were able to speak to Mike about this; he has a great eye for these issues and has given you sound advice on how florists can claim their listings.

The community edits feature on Google Maps allows users to update and correct data without having to go through business owners who may or may not know about the Local Business Center. However, the system in place is designed to catch cases of "hijacking." We're vetting it right now to see where we can improve.

If you see any more specific cases where florists can't claim their listings because the data is changed, feel free to let us know in the Google Maps Help Group, or in a follow-up to this post.

Maps Guide Jen

CHR Author Profile Page said:

Jen -

Thank you so much for any and all help you can give to these local florists. I see that a few have already made their way to the Google Maps Help Group.

You are right - Mike Blumenthal is a true gem. (With 'blumen' in his name, he's a natural to help florists.) :)

Cathy

800Florals.com said:

This situation was brought to our attention yesterday by a couple of fellow florists because some of the listings in question appear to be redirecting to our site. We believe the party responsible recently signed up for our online "affiliate program" as well as those of other florists. So, we reported the matter to our program's third-party administrator for immediate review and prompt termination of the party's participation. As a third generation family-owned florist with multiple locations, we applaud Google's efforts, and fellow florists' vigilence, to protect the accuracy and validity of local merchant listings. We also appreciate our peers' understanding that we were only temporary unwitting pawns of some apparently unscrupulous third party.

@800Florals

I trust that you were not involved in the illegal side of this excersise. However, it appears that you have profited from it. I would suggest that you review your records and return these ill-gotten gains.

Mike Blumenthal

I really hope that the search engines are starting to learn a lesson from these things and will focus less on profits and realize that even though they are claiming that they provide the best information for their surfers, there are a few key industries, like flowers online that are heavily targeted by spammers and that their organic and sponsored results are littered with false advertising.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by CHR published on September 13, 2008 8:52 PM.

FTD Google Adwords Scam was the previous entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

  • AddThis Feed Button
  • AddThis Social Bookmark Button